Here is a copy of the opening statement in Austin Dacey's 2004 debate with William Lane Craig at Purdue University. He argues for atheism properly and effectively - by examining the direction of the overall empirical evidences. I encourage people to take the 17 minutes required to watch, and ponder, the arguments. Austin Dacey, who has a PhD in philosophy, makes the following five simple arguments in this video for the conclusion that there is "insufficient evidence for theism and overwhelming evidence for atheism":
* Hiddenness of God
* Success of science
* Mind-brain connection
* Evolution
* Pointless suffering
* Hiddenness of God
* Success of science
* Mind-brain connection
* Evolution
* Pointless suffering
No comments:
Post a Comment